Lets face it - most of these books are for bored (and gullible) blokes of a certain age who fantasise about being more involved that they were at the time and lap up some of the wilder claims about 'what it was really like.'
Can't blame a guy for separating these people from their folding stuff.
They're never going to be a literary masterpiece but was interesting to read tales from the not-to-distant past[/quote]
Actually the first two written by the Chelsea Martin's (King and Knight), Naughty Nineties and Hoolifan, were top class. I thought they were excellent reads. Unfortunately one of them went all 'Hooliewood' after that and colaborated with numerous different firms from Cardiff to Forest to Swansea to Rangers and they were absolute dross, all followed a trend - never ran, we were the hardest, blah blah blah. The Rangers book was literally thrown together and the worst book I have ever read - on any subject.
Bovver was excellent. I liked the Stoke book for it's honesty. Luton something similar. Some of them gave a social history rather than the usual clichèd bullshit but, my god, there has been some amount of dross.
It's one of those things, I can't even remember what the score was sometimes, let alone who scored but any bother and I could tell you what trainers they had on. Very bizarre.
Zitat von RhysExactly. I struggle to understand why people love FV books. This thoughthas blown my mind, I can't believe someone would have such an ego that they would think people would want to read about their life story.
You'd be surprised mate, a lot of lads would lap this sort of shite up. Type of lads who want to grow up to be Danny Dyer.
Zitat von casualcol They're never going to be a literary masterpiece but was interesting to read tales from the not-to-distant past
Actually the first two written by the Chelsea Martin's (King and Knight), Naughty Nineties and Hoolifan, were top class. I thought they were excellent reads. Unfortunately one of them went all 'Hooliewood' after that and colaborated with numerous different firms from Cardiff to Forest to Swansea to Rangers and they were absolute dross, all followed a trend - never ran, we were the hardest, blah blah blah. The Rangers book was literally thrown together and the worst book I have ever read - on any subject.
Bovver was excellent. I liked the Stoke book for it's honesty. Luton something similar. Some of them gave a social history rather than the usual clichèd bullshit but, my god, there has been some amount of dross.[/quote]
Disagree on Forest one, it's a very honest account when did well/got battered. A lot was missed but good luck to him. Think the author wrote in whilst banned, the people who write them tend to have given up and just want a bit of pay off.
Heard that AA was a bit of a hanger on as was guy who wrote Liverpool boys... Stoke one was good though when author came to Nottingham late 80s he was laying on floor of car in case someone recognised him, I know because my mate was driving the car.