[quote="coopy100"][quote="Mersons Bookie"]Usama supporters protesting at the US embassy in London today. Shouldve shot the fuckers[/quote] Why? Thats one of the cornerstones of our society. The right to protest and free speech. Just because we don't agree does not mean people should not be allowed to voice their opinions in a peaceful manner.[/quote]
Supporting a man who funds people to blow up innocent people?
These are the same cunts who spit on our soldiers, they should be thrown in jail for a few years at the very least.
[quote="Leicester_Loyal"][quote="coopy100"][quote="Mersons Bookie"]Usama supporters protesting at the US embassy in London today. Shouldve shot the fuckers[/quote] Why? Thats one of the cornerstones of our society. The right to protest and free speech. Just because we don't agree does not mean people should not be allowed to voice their opinions in a peaceful manner.[/quote]
Supporting a man who funds people to blow up innocent people?
These are the same cunts who spit on our soldiers, they should be thrown in jail for a few years at the very least.[/quote]
Yes what osama ot usama or whatever he did was morrally wrong. However that is not the point I am making. I am making the point that it is within their constitutional rights to be able to protest, to be able to voice their opinions however unpalatable they may be to us and if they do this in a peaceful manner they should be allowed to do this. Any mention of we would not be able to do this in the middle east makes any arguements or points void IMHO. You talk of soldiers but was this basic right of our society not one of the main reasons that ww2 is still clebrated in this and other countries? It gave us the ability to continue to do such things. It may not sit well with us but it is their right to do it. As for the moral high ground I feel that many of the citizens of dresden would find this very shaky ground to be standing on. I would like to point out that I in no way support terrorism or feel that bomber comand had anything to be ashamed of but I am trying to give context to my arguement.
I'm not really sure of all this pressure, I'm never gonna lose any of my old letters, 'Cause they'll stay with me, Until I can see that I'm no one
Ok, so maybe it was the champers talking with regards to shooting them.
But protesting in favour of the no.1 most wanted man who has killed thousands is surely inciting violence and makes a mockery of free speech. These people are a fucking disgrace and have no right to be in OUR country
[quote="coopy100"][quote="Leicester_Loyal"][quote="coopy100"][quote="Mersons Bookie"]Usama supporters protesting at the US embassy in London today. Shouldve shot the fuckers[/quote] Why? Thats one of the cornerstones of our society. The right to protest and free speech. Just because we don't agree does not mean people should not be allowed to voice their opinions in a peaceful manner.[/quote]
Supporting a man who funds people to blow up innocent people?
These are the same cunts who spit on our soldiers, they should be thrown in jail for a few years at the very least.[/quote]
Yes what osama ot usama or whatever he did was morrally wrong. However that is not the point I am making. I am making the point that it is within their constitutional rights to be able to protest, to be able to voice their opinions however unpalatable they may be to us and if they do this in a peaceful manner they should be allowed to do this. Any mention of we would not be able to do this in the middle east makes any arguements or points void IMHO. You talk of soldiers but was this basic right of our society not one of the main reasons that ww2 is still clebrated in this and other countries? It gave us the ability to continue to do such things. It may not sit well with us but it is their right to do it. As for the moral high ground I feel that many of the citizens of dresden would find this very shaky ground to be standing on. I would like to point out that I in no way support terrorism or feel that bomber comand had anything to be ashamed of but I am trying to give context to my arguement. [/quote]
I see where you are coming from and I agree to an extent. Freedom of speech is a cornerstone of democracy. However, with rights comes responsibilities and it is clearly against the law to spit at soldiers, or anyone for that matter - that is a common assualt. I would argue further that it is against the law to shout and chant for the death of certain individuals - that is surely a breach of the peace. So while these morons have every right to protest, they also have responsibility which comes with these rights. They are not respecting these responsibilites. It is freedom of speech, not freedom to do whatever the fuck you want despite it infringing on other peoples rights.